Member-only story

On Forbes, an Anti-racism Trainer Admits I’m Right: Anti-racism Has Been Ineffective

Will Shetterly
3 min readJan 7, 2022

--

BJ70159, CC BY-SA 4.0

One of Forbes’ senior contributors, Janice Gassam Asare, begins What People Misunderstand About Anti-Racism Training with this sentence:

“A recently published Medium article by Comrade Morlock explored why anti-racism training is ineffective.”

She insists the criticism I’ve shared only applies to the older model of anti-racism training:

“In the Medium article, Comrade Morlock argues that anti-racism training is ineffective but there is an important distinction that must be made. A wealth of evidence has assessed diversity and inclusion (D&I) training, and not anti-racism training. The murder of George Floyd caused a spike in interest in anti-racism training, but much of the research has examined diversity training in general and not anti-racism training specifically. Anti-racism training is a newer and more niche type of education that organizations are investing in. There is not enough evidence yet to assess the effectiveness of this type of training long-term, since it is still quite novel.”

I agree with those facts: The old approach failed there’s no evidence that the new approach will do any better. I do not share her optimism for the new approach because of her second admission:

--

--

Will Shetterly
Will Shetterly

Written by Will Shetterly

If you’re losing an argument with me and are too proud to admit defeat, please feel free to insult me instead.

Responses (4)