The Problem with Proportionality if your Goal is Justice

Comrade Morlock
5 min readDec 6, 2021

“The movement for racial justice has shifted its focus from inequality to “disparity,” while neatly evading any critique of the structures that produce inequality.” — Adolph Reed Jr.

During the civil rights era, we thought racial and economic justice were linked. We especially wanted four things:

  1. The end of poverty with Basic Income.
  2. A minimum wage that is a living wage, as it was originally intended to be.
  3. Free higher education so everyone has the opportunity to rise.
  4. Universal health care because medical care is a need, not a luxury.

We lost. Thanks to the adoption of neoliberal economics under Carter and Reagan, the wealth gap between the bottom 80% and the top 20% has grown and class mobility has decreased . Today, the countries with the greatest class mobility are Scandinavian; the US ranks #27.

Though class is the US’s greatest taboo, the great majority of Americans know our system is unfair. In 2012, Dan Ariely wrote that “Americans — regardless of political affiliation, income, and gender” thought 11% of our wealth should go to the poorest fifth of the nation and 32% of the wealth should go to the richest. As you can see below, they underestimated how unfair the system actually is. In…

--

--

Comrade Morlock

If you’re losing an argument with me and are too proud to admit defeat, please feel free to insult me instead.